A Court Boosts the Rebel League
The European Super League (ESL) unveiled its proposed new structure on Thursday, receiving a significant boost from a morning court ruling.
The European Court of Justice deemed UEFA and FIFA to have violated competition law by blocking the league’s creation in 2021.
This marked a crucial development in a legal battle initiated by the European Super League Company, which faced sanctions and widespread criticism for its breakaway plans.
UEFA President’s Response
In response to the ESL’s proposed structure, UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin expressed satisfaction at the clarity brought by the presentation.
Despite the immediate rejection of the new format by several clubs, including Manchester United, Bayern Munich, and Atletico Madrid, Ceferin refrained from attempting to thwart the plans.
His stance indicated a willingness to let the breakaway competition proceed, emphasizing that football is not for sale.
Ceferin’s Reluctant Approval
Ceferin acknowledged the closed nature of the competition, a fact previously denied by the ESL organizers.
While expressing happiness at the presentation’s transparency, he maintained UEFA’s non-interference stance, emphasizing that they had never sought to impede the ESL.
However, Ceferin questioned the prudence of the ESL’s actions, stating his uncertainty about whether they truly understand the consequences.
UEFA’s measured response to the proposed ESL structure reflects a delicate balance between asserting the principles of football not being for sale and avoiding unnecessary confrontation.
Ceferin’s acceptance of the league’s closed nature is paired with a cautionary tone, suggesting doubts about the ESL’s comprehension of the potential repercussions.
As the ESL gains legal ground, the power dynamics in European football continue to evolve, raising questions about the future landscape of elite club competitions.Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn