A long-running boundary dispute between two neighbours in the picturesque village of Thrussington, Leicestershire, has finally come to an end.

After four years of legal battles, David Wright, a skilled artisan potter, has emerged victorious against his neighbour, Dee Narga, a painter with a passion for ducks.

The disagreement, which involved a narrow stream dividing their properties, escalated to a staggering £300,000 in court costs.

The Dispute: A Brook at the Heart of It All

David Wright, who lives in a charming home with his wife Laura and children, had always believed that the 4-foot-wide brook running through his property was part of his garden.

His children often played in the water, making memories in the babbling stream.

However, when Ms Narga, an NHS administrator, purchased the neighbouring property—Brook Barn—she claimed the stream was within her property boundaries.

Ms Narga, who had bought Brook Barn in 2020 with plans to transform the former pig farm into a large house, believed the stream was part of her garden when she made the purchase.

She began to tear down an existing fence on her side of the water to establish her ownership.

This move encroached on the Wrights’ peaceful garden, which David described as a quiet sanctuary for contemplation and creativity.

Court of Appeal Steps In

Despite Ms Narga’s initial victory in two court clashes, the Court of Appeal ultimately sided with the Wrights and their neighbours, the Claphams, ruling that their longstanding use of the land had established their ownership.

The neighbours had treated the brook and the land on both banks as part of their properties for decades, long before Ms Narga moved in.

Lord Justice Peter Jackson, who ruled in the Wrights’ favour, noted that the dispute could have been avoided if Ms Narga had consulted with her neighbours before purchasing Brook Barn.

He also expressed concerns over the £300,000 legal costs incurred by both parties, suggesting that the entire ordeal could have been prevented with some communication.

The Costly Battle: Legal Fees and Missteps

The legal battle saw both sides incur substantial costs, including expert witness fees and lawyer bills.

The total cost of the dispute surpassed £300,000, a sum that was criticized by the court.

Jackson pointed out that Ms Narga’s decision to buy Brook Barn during the first Covid lockdown without consulting her neighbours contributed to the escalating conflict.

Had she engaged with the Wrights and Claphams beforehand, the dispute may never have arisen.

The Impact of Adverse Possession

One of the key elements in the court’s decision was the doctrine of adverse possession, also known as “squatters’ rights.”

The Wrights and the Claphams had used the brook and its banks as part of their gardens for decades, giving them ownership of the land.

Despite Ms Narga’s claim to the stream based on the 2002 Land Registration Act, the court ruled that the longstanding use of the land by the Wrights and Claphams trumped her “paper title” to the land.

Lord Justice Nugee emphasized that the brook and its banks were effectively removed from the title of Brook Barn due to the neighbours’ established possession.

The legal principle of adverse possession allows property owners to claim land they have used peacefully and continuously for a set period, even if the land is not formally registered to them.

The Village and the Dispute’s Toll

The dispute has not only been costly but emotionally taxing for all involved.

The Wrights and Claphams had cultivated and maintained the disputed land for years, creating gardens and wildlife havens.

When Ms Narga began clearing vegetation and erecting a fence, it disrupted the idyllic peace of their small village, which is home to just 500 residents.

The legal clash over the stream, which passes through their properties and into the River Wreake, has left a bitter legacy among the neighbours.

What Happens Next?

While the Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of the Wrights and Claphams, the exact amounts in costs each side will need to pay will be decided in a future court hearing.

As the dispute finally draws to a close, the hope is that the neighbours can begin to rebuild their relationships and restore peace to their picturesque corner of Leicestershire.

This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!

Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn