Marine veteran Daniel Penny is scheduled to stand trial in October over the death of Jordan Neely, a mentally ill homeless man who tragically died after being placed in a chokehold on a New York City subway last May.
During a Manhattan Supreme Court appearance on Wednesday, Supreme Court Justice Maxwell Wiley announced that the trial would commence on October 8, along with a suppression hearing set for September 17.
Penny, 25, appeared in court dressed in a navy suit, white shirt, and burgundy tie, facing charges of involuntary manslaughter in connection with Neely’s death. Despite his plea of not guilty, his defense attorneys’ attempts to dismiss the case were rejected earlier in January.
The incident, which was captured on film, shows Penny applying a chokehold on Neely, rendering him unconscious. Neely was pronounced dead at the scene, and subsequent medical examination classified his death as a homicide, attributing it to the chokehold-induced neck injuries.
Family’s Emotional Response and Legal Advocacy
Neely’s father, Andre Zachery, was present in court during the announcement of the trial date. Emotionally affected, he sought justice for his son, expressing ongoing suffering and the hope for a fair resolution in the case.
Lennon Edwards, representing Neely’s family, emphasized the distress and pain endured by the family, urging the court to consider Neely’s vulnerability and the circumstances surrounding his death.
He reiterated the family’s quest for justice and highlighted their expectations for the upcoming trial.
Controversy and Legal Arguments
The case has garnered significant attention and controversy, drawing comparisons to high-profile incidents such as the death of George Floyd.
Penny’s defense argues that his actions were justified, as he intervened to protect bystanders from what they perceived as threatening behavior from Neely.
However, critics question the justification for the use of force and view the incident as emblematic of broader issues surrounding mental health and public safety in New York City.
Last year, Penny’s legal team attempted to have the charges dismissed, citing witness testimony describing Neely’s behavior as threatening and traumatic.
They also raised concerns about the validity of the medical examiner’s findings, pointing to Neely’s drug use as a potential contributing factor to his death.
Despite these arguments, Justice Wiley upheld the charges, affirming the medical examiner’s conclusions and the prosecution’s case against Penny.
Broader Implications and Legal Precedent
The case has sparked discussions about law enforcement responses to individuals experiencing mental health crises, as well as the use of force in public spaces. It underscores the complexities surrounding the intersection of mental health, law enforcement, and criminal justice.
As the trial approaches, the legal proceedings are expected to shed light on the circumstances leading to Neely’s death and provide insight into the application of justice in cases involving use of force by civilians.
While Penny awaits trial, the case continues to prompt reflection on the challenges facing individuals experiencing homelessness and mental illness, as well as the responsibilities of law enforcement and the broader community in addressing these issues.
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn