Recent revelations indicate that the Parole Board has recommended a move to an open prison for Paul Smith, who is now 38 years old. This development marks his second parole appeal since becoming eligible in 2018.
The board suggests a ‘staged progression’ for Smith, potentially leading to his release on licence. The decision highlights a nuanced evaluation of Smith’s behavior and progress during his time in custody.
Smith’s History and Rehabilitation Efforts:
Smith’s troubled history includes a transfer to a secure psychiatric hospital in 2014 due to concerns about his behavior in prison. While at the hospital, he underwent therapeutic interventions focusing on anger management and decision-making.
Despite a common assault incident in 2015, he returned to a closed prison in 2018 without accessing additional training programs. The prison psychiatrist noted Smith’s application of skills and learning during his incarceration.
Differing Opinions and Support Systems:
The decision-making process involved varied opinions from different stakeholders.
While an independently commissioned psychiatrist and psychologist recommended Smith’s safe release, his probation officer, the prison psychologist, and the official overseeing his case supported a move to open conditions.
A crucial factor in the assessment was the potential support Smith could receive from family members in the community, seen as a protective factor against reoffending.
Release Plan Considerations:
The parole board carefully considered a release plan proposed by Smith’s probation officer.
This plan included residing in designated accommodation and imposing strict limitations on contacts, movements, and activities.
However, the board deemed the proposals not robust enough, ultimately deciding against releasing Smith on licence.
Secretary of State’s Role:
The final decision rests with the Secretary of State, Alan Chalk, who has 28 days to accept or reject the Parole Board’s recommendation.
The Secretary of State’s decision will significantly impact Smith’s future and the safety considerations for the public.
Smith’s Criminal Background and Trial:
During the trial, Smith, who has Asperger’s Syndrome, pleaded not guilty to smothering Rosie May at the party while her parents were engaged with guests downstairs.
However, a jury found him guilty of the murder. Rosie May, a talented ballet dancer, had just secured an audition for the English National Opera.
Judicial Perspective and Prior Incidents:
Mr. Justice Astill, during sentencing, expressed concern about Smith’s danger to young girls and referenced his history of violence against them.
Smith had previously carried out at least two similar attacks, one involving threatening a teenage friend with an air rifle.
His violent tendencies were evident in the abduction of a 16-year-old girl, showcasing a disturbing pattern of behavior.
Parents’ Perspective and Public Reaction:
Following the verdict, Smith’s parents claimed that their ‘vulnerable’ son had been unfairly blamed for the crime, portraying him as an ‘easy target.’