The Supreme Court is poised to deliver a crucial judgment today, determining the legality of Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda asylum policy.
The government’s high-stakes moment comes as Suella Braverman issues a warning, emphasizing the absence of a credible backup plan to ‘stop the boats.’
The Verdict and Potential Impact:
Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs, and Sales will pronounce their verdict on the Prime Minister’s legislation to deport asylum seekers to Kigali.
If approved, the plan could see 370 migrants sent to Rwanda by January. However, skepticism looms over the success of these efforts, and defeat would deal a significant blow to Sunak’s administration, reigniting tensions with the ousted home secretary.
Braverman’s Warning and Political Fallout:
In a scathing letter to the Prime Minister, Braverman warns of a potential ‘betrayal’ and highlights the lack of a ‘credible Plan B.’ Even in the event of Supreme Court approval, she asserts that compromises may render the asylum policy vulnerable to challenges from the European Court of Human Rights.
Overview of Rwanda Policy:
The Migration and Economic Development Partnership, signed in April 2022, outlines a one-way ticket to Rwanda for those deemed to have made ‘dangerous or illegal journeys’ to the UK. Legal battles have surrounded the policy, with the Court of Appeal questioning the lawfulness of the deportation plan.
Possible Government Responses:
As the government braces for the verdict, contingency plans are in motion. Options include elevating the Rwanda deal to a ratified treaty and passing emergency legislation to disapply human rights laws. However, Downing Street remains committed to tackling small boat crossings, irrespective of the court’s decision.
Supreme Court Judges and Their Roles:
A panel of five Supreme Court justices, including Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, and Lord Sales, will decide the fate of the Rwanda deportation policy. Each justice brings a unique perspective to this high-profile case.
Timeline of Events Leading to the Verdict:
The Supreme Court’s decision follows more than 18 months of legal battles and political debates since the announcement of the Rwanda deportation plan in 2022.
The timeline highlights key events and challenges faced by the government in addressing the Channel migrant crisis.
In summary, the Supreme Court’s judgment holds immense significance for the future of the government’s asylum policy and the broader discourse on immigration, setting the stage for potential political and legal ramifications.