Tennis has always been a sport of focus, precision, and mental toughness—but some players are now raising concerns about the increasing intrusion off the court.
After recent footage of Coco Gauff smashing her racket during the Australian Open went viral, world No. 2 Iga Swiatek spoke out, saying players are being treated “like animals in a zoo.”
The debate over Big Brother-style filming at tournaments has intensified, with athletes questioning whether constant observation is fair or necessary.
Coco Gauff hinted at the issue earlier, suggesting there should be room for conversations about cameras in player areas after her emotional quarter-final exit.
Swiatek Calls for Privacy
Swiatek didn’t hold back.
“The question is, are we tennis players or animals in a zoo, observed even when we… you know, just live our lives?” she joked, though the message was serious.
The Pole stressed the importance of having private spaces to process emotions and prepare for matches without the world watching.
She highlighted examples from other major tournaments, noting that at Wimbledon, players have practice courts like Aorangi where fans aren’t allowed, and at Roland Garros, Jean-Bouin provides a space for private practice.
But at some events, players are constantly monitored—either by cameras or fans with access.
Private Moments Captured on Camera
Swiatek shared her own experiences, including being filmed in tears during a massage at the French Open in 2024 after a tough match against Naomi Osaka.
At this year’s Australian Open, she even forgot her accreditation pass and had to wait for security, a moment that UK broadcasters turned into light-hearted content.
“It’s not simple,” Swiatek said.
“We’re meant to be watched on the court and in the press, that’s our job.
But it’s not our job to become a meme when we forget a pass. People might laugh, but for us, it’s unnecessary.”
Teammates Understand the Struggle
Elena Rybakina, who beat Swiatek 7-5, 6-1, and will face Jessica Pegula in the semi-finals, also noted the challenges of being filmed.
Her fellow American Amanda Anisimova managed to avoid cameras during an emotional moment.
“I knew the cameras were there, so I kept my head down and went straight to the locker room,” Rybakina said.
“There are good moments fans love to see, but when you lose, those private moments should stay private.
Coco didn’t have a say in that video being posted, and that’s tough.”
Tournament Organizers Respond
The Australian Open issued a statement acknowledging the tension between fan engagement and player privacy.
They emphasized efforts to create private spaces for athletes, including quiet rooms, strategy rooms, sleep rooms, and medical and wellbeing facilities.
Cameras are mainly placed in operational areas like warm-up zones, cool-down areas, and the paths players take to and from the court, designed to give fans a closer connection to the athletes.
“Striking the right balance between showcasing players and protecting their comfort is a priority,” the AO said.
The Debate Continues
As fans demand more behind-the-scenes content, players continue to push back for their personal space.
The discussion raises questions about how much access is too much—and how tournaments can respect athletes’ privacy while still engaging audiences.
What comes next might redefine how tennis tournaments handle media coverage, balancing visibility with the simple human need for privacy.
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn