Former First Lady’s Press Secretary, Michael LaRosa, Faces Controversy Over Hotel Incident During NATO Summit

Former First Lady’s Press Secretary, Michael LaRosa, Faces Controversy Over Hotel Incident During NATO Summit

In an exclusive revelation, sources disclose that Michael LaRosa, the former press secretary for the First Lady, attempted to bring a date to a secure floor where the First Family was staying during the 2022 NATO summit in Madrid.

This incident, which occurred twice during the same trip, allegedly contributed to LaRosa’s subsequent resignation due to a pattern of erratic behavior.

The revelation sheds light on the circumstances surrounding his departure and raises questions about his conduct while in the White House.

The Hotel Incident:

During the NATO Summit in Madrid in June 2022, LaRosa, aged 40, reportedly tried to bring a date to his room on a secure floor, jeopardizing the security protocols in place for the First Lady.

Secret Service sources confirm that the incident happened twice on the same trip.

Concerns were raised about LaRosa’s actions compromising the safety of the First Lady, as individuals entering secure floors are expected to undergo thorough vetting.

Conflicting Accounts:

In response to these allegations, LaRosa, who identifies as openly gay, admitted to attempting to bring a male staffer from another country’s delegation to his room but denied any violation of security protocols.

He contends that he left the White House on good terms to pursue a job in the private sector.

However, insider accounts suggest a different narrative, portraying a troubled tenure marked by chaotic behavior, unreliability, and lack of judgment.

Post-White House Commentary:

After leaving the White House, LaRosa transitioned into a role as a political commentator on major news networks, positioning himself as an insider with deep knowledge of the Biden administration’s inner workings.

Former colleagues, however, dispute his portrayal, asserting that he was never a part of high-level strategy meetings and did not hold the influence he now claims.

Allegations of Unreliable Behavior:

Former colleagues paint a picture of LaRosa as increasingly unreliable during his time in the White House.

Accusations range from inexplicable disappearances during work hours and missed calls to leaking information to the media.

One notable incident involved him allegedly tipping off reporters about the First Lady’s off-the-record movement into Ukraine, posing a security risk.

Security Faux Pas:

The Madrid hotel incident is described as the tipping point that led to LaRosa’s departure.

Attempting to bring someone to a secure floor, even for a casual meeting, raised serious security concerns, particularly given the heightened security measures around the First Family.

Colleagues express that breaking the security bubble during official trips is an unacceptable breach of protocol.

LaRosa’s Defense:

LaRosa, in his defense, maintains that there was no security violation and that bringing someone to a staff floor was a common occurrence.

He attributes the controversy to misinterpretation and emphasizes that he left the White House voluntarily for a job opportunity in the private sector.

He suggests that the timing of these revelations may be linked to his recent criticism of the administration’s handling of certain issues.

Reactions and Disputes:

While LaRosa disputes the allegations, former colleagues stand by their accounts of his unreliable behavior and security breaches.

The conflicting narratives raise questions about transparency during his departure and the veracity of his subsequent public statements.

The First Lady’s current press secretary dismisses LaRosa’s characterization of his time in the White House as “wildly inaccurate.”


The controversy surrounding Michael LaRosa underscores the challenges of navigating the delicate balance between personal conduct and professional responsibilities, especially within the confines of the White House.

As details continue to emerge, the incident in Madrid remains a focal point, prompting reflections on the expectations placed on individuals entrusted with the security and confidentiality of the First Family.