A disagreement has emerged between Uber and the Lagos state government regarding the sharing of real-time user trip data, putting the 2020 agreement between ride-hailing platforms and the government at risk.

While competitor Bolt has agreed to the terms, Uber is hesitant, citing concerns over privacy and legal ramifications.

Government’s Real-Time Data Demand Raises Concerns

The Lagos State government, as part of ride-hailing regulations introduced in 2020, requested backend access to user trips and location data for planning, revenue, and security purposes.

However, the recent demand for real-time trip details has sparked controversy, with ride-hailing companies facing sanctions for non-compliance.

Diverging Perspectives on Data Sharing

While the government argues that real-time access to trip details is essential for identifying drivers and riders and ensuring user safety during emergencies,

Uber expresses reservations. Uber fears that granting such access could lead to user surveillance and potential legal liabilities.

Privacy vs. Public Good

Amidst the standoff, voices like Kehinde Adegboyega, founder of the Human Rights Journalists Network, advocate for a responsible data-sharing framework that balances public good and individual privacy.

Achieving this balance is crucial for leveraging data to improve transportation services without compromising user privacy.

Competitor Compliance vs. Uber’s Resistance

While Uber remains hesitant to share real-time trip details with the Lagos state government, Bolt and another unidentified ride-hailing company have already complied with the new rule.

The differing responses underscore the complexities and implications of data sharing in the ride-hailing industry amidst regulatory scrutiny.

Business News