SIA Investigates and Holds Luton Security Director Mohammed Shaba Accountable for Supplying Unlicensed Security Operative

A Luton-based security company director has been penalised after supplying an unlicensed door supervisor, highlighting the strict enforcement of the UK’s private security regulations.

Guilty Plea in Court

On 17 March 2026, Mohammed Shaba, director of Peack Global Security Ltd, admitted guilt at Luton Magistrates’ Court under the Private Security Industry Act (PSIA).

He pleaded guilty to offences under Section 5(1), for supplying unlicensed security operatives, and Section 23, which holds company directors criminally liable for such breaches.

The court imposed a fine of £507 on Shaba, alongside a £207 victim surcharge and £500 in prosecution costs.

Additionally, Shaba’s company, Peack Global Security Ltd, was ordered to pay £141 in prosecution costs.

Altogether, fines and costs for both Shaba and his company total £1,351.

The Offence

The case stemmed from Peack Global Security Ltd deploying an unlicensed door supervisor over a six-month period.

The company did not verify the operative’s SIA licence, despite the individual performing duties at a venue that made 36 separate payments, amounting to over £2,000.

SIA Lead Financial Investigator David Will stressed the risk posed to the public:

Suggested Readings (News continues below)

Environment Agency Arrests Birmingham Man for Multi Million Pound Waste Packaging Fraud and Money Laundering

Max Verstappen ejects British journalist Giles Richards from Japanese Grand Prix press conference after reigniting Abu Dhabi 2025 feud

Rodri Signals Manchester City Exit as Midfield Star Hints at Real Madrid Transfer Move in Spain

Starmer Struggles to Defend Missing Labour Aide Phone Messages in UK Amid Allegations of Mandelson Cover Up

“Mr Shaba, through his company, profited from deploying an unlicensed security officer, which put members of the public at risk.

An SIA licence ensures security operatives have relevant training and the right to work in the private security industry.

I am pleased to see this has been recognised in the fine and costs that he is required to pay as a result of this successful prosecution.”

Legal Requirements

Under the Private Security Industry Act 2001, all security operatives working under contract must hold a valid SIA licence.

The offences in this case fall under:

• Section 5(1) – Supply of unlicensed security operatives
• Section 23 – Criminal liability of company directors

The Security Industry Authority (SIA), reporting to the Home Secretary, regulates the private security sector in the UK.

Its duties include licensing individuals for designated activities and overseeing the voluntary Approved Contractor Scheme (ACS).

Impact and Consequences

This prosecution sends a strong message across the UK private security sector: failing to check licensing credentials can result in personal fines, company costs, and reputational damage.

It also serves as a reminder that deploying unlicensed staff can endanger public safety and compromise client trust.

What’s Next?

Peack Global Security Ltd and Shaba have completed their fines, but the case may trigger stricter compliance reviews by the SIA.

Security firms across the country are being urged to verify licences diligently to avoid similar sanctions.

Summary

Mohammed Shaba and his company pleaded guilty to supplying an unlicensed door supervisor in Luton.

The fines total £1,351, reflecting the SIA’s commitment to public safety and the enforcement of licensing laws.

Bulleted Takeaways

• Luton-based security director Mohammed Shaba prosecuted for supplying an unlicensed door supervisor.
• Peack Global Security Ltd also fined for failing to check the operative’s SIA licence.
• Offences violated Section 5(1) and Section 23 of the Private Security Industry Act 2001.
• Total fines and costs amounted to £1,351.
• SIA warns all security companies to verify licences to protect the public and avoid legal consequences.