Pete Hegseth Orders Review of Senator Mark Kelly’s Military Rank and Pension in Washington Following Video Urging Troops to Question Orders

Pete Hegseth Orders Review of Senator Mark Kelly’s Military Rank and Pension in Washington Following Video Urging Troops to Question Orders

Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain and former astronaut, is facing scrutiny from the Department of War after appearing in a video urging U.S. troops to question and potentially refuse orders he deemed illegal.

The video, which featured five other Democratic lawmakers, has sparked a heated political and military debate.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has announced administrative action against Kelly, citing the senator’s “reckless and seditious” statements as undermining military discipline.

According to Hegseth, the review could impact Kelly’s rank and pension, signaling a rare and serious response from the Pentagon.


What Kelly Said

The video in question, released in November, showed Kelly and his colleagues highlighting the legal right of service members to reject unlawful commands. “Our laws are clear.

You can refuse illegal orders,” Kelly stated, drawing on his own military background to bolster his argument.

Although the lawmakers referenced their military and intelligence experience, they did not name any specific illegal orders or allege wrongdoing by former President Donald Trump or Secretary Hegseth.

Nonetheless, the video has been interpreted by some government officials as a direct challenge to lawful military authority.


The Pentagon Responds

Hegseth’s office sent Kelly a formal censure letter, initiating a 45-day review of his military status.

Kelly has 30 days to respond. The letter argues that, as a retired officer still receiving military pay, Kelly remains subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

In a pointed note, Hegseth even referred to Kelly as “Captain (for now),” highlighting the possible consequences.

“These actions are based on Captain Kelly’s public statements from June through December 2025,” Hegseth wrote.

“He characterized lawful military operations as illegal and advised members of the Armed Forces to disobey lawful orders.”


Kelly Pushes Back

In response, Kelly dismissed the censure and any threat of demotion as politically motivated.

“If Pete Hegseth, the most unqualified Secretary of Defense in our country’s history, thinks he can intimidate me with a censure or threats, he doesn’t get it,” Kelly said.

He emphasized that his fight is about principle, not personal gain.

“I will fight this with everything I’ve got — not for myself, but to show that Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump cannot dictate what Americans are allowed to say about their government,” he added.


Political Fallout

The video drew strong criticism from former President Trump, who called the lawmakers’ actions “seditious” and, in extreme statements on social media, invoked execution as a punishment.

While Trump’s reaction was widely condemned, it fueled the ongoing debate over the limits of speech for military veterans in government.

Hegseth clarified that the other five Democrats featured in the video — including Senators Elissa Slotkin, Representatives Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan — will not face review because they are outside the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.


Support from Democratic Leadership

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer defended Kelly, describing him as “a hero and a patriot committed to serving the American people.”

Schumer criticized Hegseth as acting on behalf of Trump rather than the military or the country, calling the move “a despicable act of political retribution.”

Kelly’s office has not issued further comment beyond his initial statement.

The situation is now set to unfold over the coming weeks as the Pentagon review proceeds.


The Question at the Heart of the Matter

This controversy raises a bigger issue: Should lawmakers with military backgrounds face potential consequences for advising troops to question orders they consider unlawful?

The debate is sure to continue as the government balances freedom of speech with military discipline.

Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn

Related News