Today, the Bank of England pressed the panic button once more in an effort to prevent falling government bond prices from triggering a market collapse.
The central bank said that it will increase its purchases of gilts, stating that a “fire sale” of the sovereign bonds poses a “substantial threat” to the financial stability of the United Kingdom.
The extraordinary step was taken when yields on 30-year gilts climbed back toward the 5% level that threatened pension funds at the end of the previous month.
In the turbulence that followed Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-Budget, a complex arrangement employed by many funds to hedge against inflation backfired as gilt values plummeted, causing interest rates to rise.
They have been compelled to sell additional gilts in order to satisfy margin calls from investment managers, which has further depressed prices.
The Bank previously stabilized the market by announcing it would acquire up to £65 billion in long-term government bonds. The Bank must now also purchase index-linked gilts as a result of the most recent sell-off.
The Bank stated in a statement that market dysfunction and the possibility of self-reinforcing “fire sale” dynamics pose a significant threat to the UK’s financial stability.
The Pound did not receive much of a boost from the measure, as it remained near $1.10 after recovering from the all-time low of $1.03.
Therese Coffey, Deputy Prime Minister, went on television minutes after the Bank of England’s statement and stated that she was unaware of the action.
She also asserted that the United Kingdom’s public finances are “healthy.”
It occurred as the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned of £60 billion in spending cuts to rein in the United Kingdom’s budget.
Officials at the Bank of England have taken action again this morning after acting in September in response to Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-Budget, which threw the gilt market into a tailspin and wrecked havoc on final salary pension funds (Mr Kwarteng yesterday)
The yield on 30-year gilts had climbed to unsafe levels, prompting Bank action last week.
Ms. Coffey refuted the notion that Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng advanced his medium-term fiscal plan due to jittery markets.
She told Sky News, “I believe he concluded that we’re in a good situation, and we’ll continue to debate this with the government and Parliament in the coming weeks.”
Ms. Coffey was unaware of the Bank of England’s latest move to bolster its emergency bond-buying programme as it warned a continuing sell-off in the gilts market poses a “substantial threat” to the financial stability of the United Kingdom.
Today’s analysis says that Kwasi Kwarteng would need to cut public spending by £60 billion to keep government debts under control.
Yesterday, the Chancellor indicated he will hasten the release of a key economic statement to demonstrate his commitment to reducing the government’s enormous debts.
The so-called “medium-term fiscal plan” will now be released on October 31, just days before the Bank of England meets on November 3 to examine the possibility of a significant interest rate increase.
Yesterday, however, government borrowing costs continued to rise despite the Halloween Budget.
According to a report released by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) today, Mr. Kwarteng may need to slash spending by 15% across most departments in order to balance the budget.
Today’s analysis says that Kwasi Kwarteng would need to cut public spending by £60 billion to keep government debts under control (pictured at the Conservative Party Conference on October 3)
This would necessitate savings of more than £60 billion, according to the report, which doubts whether the government has the competence to implement expenditure restraint on this scale, stating that it risks “pushing credulity to breaking point.”
According to the IFS analysis, boosting benefits in accordance with earnings instead of inflation could generate £13 billion, while cuts to investment spending might generate a further £14 billion.
Despite the fact that the budgets of the National Health Service and the Department of Defense would be safeguarded, other departments would still be subject to severe budget cutbacks since “trimming the fat” will not be sufficient to close the gap in the public finances.
Paul Johnson, head of the IFS, stated that it was “just about plausible” that Mr. Kwarteng would be able to reduce debt in five years. However, he cautioned that planning “unspecified tax cuts” for future years would damage his credibility.
Ministers are already battling to convince Conservative MPs of the need to reduce the welfare bill, so Mr. Kwarteng faces a race against time to identify feasible savings.
One Whitehall source stated, ‘It is evident that there will be some extremely difficult decisions’
According to a second source, government ministries will likely be required to operate within their existing budgets until after the next election, when greater cuts will likely be implemented.
Mel Stride, head of the Commons Treasury committee, applauded Mr. Kwarteng’s proposal to host a Halloween Budget, stating that the idea could result in a reduced increase in interest rates, which was “crucial” for millions of mortgage holders.
He cautioned, however, that this would only be the case if the strategy “lands well with the markets” prior to the Bank’s decision. When asked if Mr. Kwarteng’s financial intentions were feasible, Mr. Stride responded, “well, we’re going to find out.”
According to today’s IFS analysis, government borrowing will reach about £200 billion this year (Truss and Kwarteng pictured on October 4)
According to today’s IFS estimate, government borrowing will now reach nearly £200 billion this year – double the £99 billion predicted at the time of the March budget.
In the meantime, an analysis by investment bank Citi predicts the economy will grow by an average of 0.8% per year over the next five years, which is significantly below the 2.5% growth rate the Chancellor stated he hopes to achieve.
The Treasury has stated that Mr. Kwarteng’s proposals will be self-financing if they succeed in boosting economic growth by 1% above the projected level.
However, he must now fight to convince the Office for Budget Responsibility that a series of supply-side reforms in sectors such as planning, energy, and immigration will turbocharge development.
Lord Macpherson, a former Treasury official, stated that the magnitude of the fiscal issue could push the Chancellor to reconsider his tax-cutting proposals.
The crossbench peer stated, “If the government is unable to restore economic credibility, the market response in the coming weeks might be substantially worse than what we have witnessed thus far.”
Yesterday, Liz Truss prevented Kwasi Kwarteng from appointing an outsider as the Treasury’s senior officer.
In an effort to shake up the department’s ‘orthodox’ thinking, the Chancellor had planned to appoint the high-achieving civil servant Antonia Romeo as permanent secretary.
Last month, on his first day in office, Mr. Kwarteng fired the previous governor, Sir Tom Scholar, in an effort to encourage the Treasury to take a more aggressive approach to growth.
According to Whitehall insiders, however, the Prime Minister vetoed Mrs. Romeo’s appointment. James Bowler, a civil service veteran and fiscal conservative, was appointed instead yesterday.
Cat Little and Beth Russell were named as Mr. Bowler’s deputy in an apparent effort to convince the financial markets of fiscal sustainability.
Yesterday, No. 10 reiterated that the nomination of Mr. Bowler was a “shared decision” between the Prime Minister and Chancellor.
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn