Historian Reveals US and Israel Actions Show World War III Could Be Underway

A respected historian has sparked debate by claiming that signs of a third world war are already visible—and may have been unfolding for years.

Anthony Glees, Emeritus Professor at the University of Buckingham, points to the recent US and Israeli military actions against Iran as a critical warning signal.

Glees suggests that this conflict represents a “war of choice,” rather than one of necessity or self-defense.

He draws parallels to the origins of the first two world wars, where aggressive leadership decisions, rather than immediate threats, set nations on a collision course.

The First Red Flag: Decisions Fueled by Power Ambitions

Glees emphasizes that the US and Israeli leaders acted with calculated intent.

According to him, President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu share a worldview where “might is right,” even if it means disregarding international law.

History, he notes, shows that similar mindsets have led to invasions and widespread bloodshed.

This deliberate choice to engage militarily, rather than seeking diplomatic solutions, marks the first indicator that global conflict may already be underway.

The Second Red Flag: Ignoring International Norms

The historian warns that such attitudes echo past aggressive regimes.

Leaders who expand territorially, justify attacks on neighboring countries, and prioritize power over peace often trigger broader conflicts.

Glees cites the Russia-Ukraine war as an example.

Russia’s invasion, which began on February 24, 2022, was a voluntary act of aggression aimed at reasserting Soviet-era influence.

The attack violated Ukraine’s sovereignty and drew in international condemnation, with the conflict continuing for years without a decisive resolution.

The Third Red Flag: Commitment to a “Forever War”

According to Glees, Trump and Netanyahu have demonstrated a willingness to prolong conflict rather than pursue rapid peace.

Despite statements suggesting the US campaign against Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is “complete,” Trump has demanded unconditional Iranian surrender before negotiating, signaling a potential endless conflict.

The historian compares this dynamic to World War II, which escalated globally only after Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor and Hitler’s subsequent declaration of war on the US.

He warns that voluntary escalation by leaders can transform regional conflicts into global catastrophes.

Rising Tensions in the Middle East

Recent developments have heightened international concern.

Reports suggest Russia may be supplying Iran with intelligence on US forces, while China and Russia have publicly condemned the US-Israeli attacks.

Experts warn that the situation could draw additional nations into the conflict, creating a broader regional—and potentially global—war.

Impact and Consequences

If Glees’s predictions hold, the implications are severe:

• Global alliances may shift, with nuclear-armed nations closely monitoring US and Israeli actions.
• Prolonged conflict could destabilize the Middle East, triggering economic and humanitarian crises.
• Regional skirmishes risk expanding into wider confrontations involving China, Russia, and North Korea.

What’s Next?

Experts are watching key variables closely:

• Whether US and Israeli forces pursue diplomacy or continue aggressive operations.
• Iran’s military response and any potential escalation involving its allies.
• International pressure from global powers to prevent a broader war.

Glees remains cautious but skeptical, suggesting that without rapid intervention or policy changes, the “forever war” scenario could unfold.

Summary

Professor Anthony Glees identifies three historical patterns suggesting that global conflict is already underway: deliberate military action by powerful nations, disregard for international law, and leaders’ commitment to prolonging conflict.

Using this lens, the Russia-Ukraine war and the US-Israeli operations in Iran may indicate the unofficial start of World War III.

Bulleted Takeaways

• Historian Glees warns the next world war may have already begun.
• US and Israel’s attacks on Iran are described as a “war of choice.”
• Shared leadership mentality of “might is right” mirrors past aggressive regimes.
• Prolonged military operations indicate a commitment to ongoing conflict.
• Russia-Ukraine war cited as another example of voluntary escalation.
• Rising tensions involve nuclear-armed nations like Russia, China, and North Korea.
• Diplomatic interventions remain crucial to preventing global catastrophe.