British Model Files Lawsuit Against Crispin Glover Alleging Battery Fraud and Civil Rights Violations in Los Angeles

Actor Crispin Glover, best known for playing George McFly in Back to the Future, is at the center of a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles by a 30-year-old British model identified in court papers as Jane Doe.

The complaint paints a disturbing picture.

Glover, 61, categorically denies every allegation.

His attorney has described the case as a complete fabrication and says the actor intends to fight it aggressively in court.

What unfolds now will hinge on documentation, witness accounts, and how a jury interprets two sharply conflicting narratives.

The Plaintiff’s Story: Promises, Relocation and Alleged Control

According to court filings, Doe claims her connection with Glover began online in 2015.

She says what started as friendly communication gradually shifted into what she characterizes as inappropriate advances.

Years later, she alleges, the actor persuaded her to leave the UK with promises of a home and a job in the entertainment industry.

She says she uprooted her life in Europe, sold belongings, and moved to Los Angeles in early 2024 to live in his Silver Lake residence.

Instead of the career opportunity she says she expected, Doe claims she encountered pressure to serve as what she describes in the suit as a live-in girlfriend.

She further alleges that Glover monitored her movements, discouraged her from leaving the house, and attempted to control her social interactions.

The Mosque Incident and Alleged Lockout

A central moment in the lawsuit revolves around a day when Doe says she left the house to attend services at a mosque.

Identifying herself in the filing as a practicing Muslim and noting that she has autism spectrum disorder, she claims Glover warned her that he would lock her out if she left.

Believing it to be an empty threat, she went anyway, the lawsuit states.

Upon returning, she alleges she found herself locked out of the home with her cats and belongings still inside.

She further claims that when she tried to retrieve her pets, Glover allegedly grabbed her by the neck and put her in a headlock, leaving what she describes as a visible injury.

The filing includes a photo that she says documents the mark.

The Police Call and Competing Claims

After the alleged altercation, police were called to the Silver Lake property in Los Angeles.

This is where the two sides diverge dramatically.

In a statement provided to media, Glover’s attorney says that on March 2, 2024, the actor was actually the victim of an unprovoked felony assault by Jane Doe.

The lawyer maintains that Glover contacted the LAPD, officers responded, investigated, and arrested her.

However, law enforcement sources cited by TMZ have reportedly said that while police did respond to a call involving an alleged assault by a man and a woman, no arrests were ultimately made.

The discrepancy between those accounts may become a critical issue in court.

The Restraining Order Dispute

The lawsuit also references a restraining order petition filed by Glover.

Doe characterizes it as fraudulent and malicious, claiming it was dismissed for failure to prosecute and that it caused reputational damage when news of it spread online.

Glover’s legal team counters that the restraining order and police records support his version of events and will demonstrate that he was the one seeking protection.

Restraining order proceedings often operate under different evidentiary standards than criminal trials, so how those filings are interpreted could shape the broader civil case.

Additional Allegations in the Complaint

Beyond battery, the complaint includes claims of fraud, malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful eviction.

Doe is also invoking California’s Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, alleging that threats of violence were used to interfere with her right to move freely and to coerce her into a relationship.

If proven, violations under that statute can lead to enhanced damages.

She is seeking general and special damages to be determined at trial, punitive damages, legal fees, and has requested a jury trial.

Glover’s Unconventional Public Persona

Glover has long maintained a reputation as one of Hollywood’s most unconventional figures.

Beyond acting, he has directed experimental films, self-financed projects, and toured with multimedia presentations.

His career has often blurred the line between art-house provocation and mainstream fame.

That eccentric public image may inevitably color public perception, though legally it has no bearing on whether the specific claims in this case are true.

What’s Next?

The case will now proceed through the civil court system in Los Angeles.

That typically means:

• Motions to dismiss or strike portions of the complaint

• Discovery, including depositions and document exchanges

• Potential mediation or settlement talks

• If unresolved, a jury trial

Civil litigation can stretch on for months or even years.

Both sides appear poised for a prolonged fight rather than a quick settlement, at least publicly.

If the case advances to trial, testimony, digital communications, lease arrangements, and police records will likely become central evidence.

Summary

Crispin Glover is being sued in Los Angeles by a British model who alleges he lured her from the UK with promises of housing and career opportunities, only to attempt to control her movements, lock her out of his home, and physically assault her.

She is seeking damages for battery, fraud, emotional distress, wrongful eviction, and civil rights violations.

Glover strongly denies the accusations, claiming he was the victim of assault and that official records will vindicate him.

Conflicting accounts about police involvement and a restraining order filing may play a pivotal role as the case unfolds.

For now, the matter remains a civil dispute headed toward deeper legal scrutiny, with both reputations and significant financial stakes on the line.