ATM’S application against Speaker struck off the roll

ATM’S application against Speaker struck off the roll

The Western Cape High Court has dismissed the African Transformation Movement’s (ATM) case against the Speaker of the National Assembly as not urgent.

The ATM demanded that the motion of no confidence in President Cyril Ramaphosa be conducted by secret vote on Wednesday.

The party has filed an urgent action against the Speaker for her decision to allow open voting.

The court agreed with the speaker’s counsel that the ATM’s application was not urgent.

In February, the Speaker of the National Assembly declined the party’s request to have the vote held through secret ballot.

The ATM said the speaker erred in her decision, and it wanted the court to set aside that decision.

ATM president Vuyo Zungula, says that previous court decisions showed that Members of Parliament had to be protected from their parties’ potential abuse in order to vote with their conscience.


Meanwhile, Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen has requested for the motion of no confidence in the entire cabinet.

Speaker, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula defended that her decision not to have an open ballot is based on the legal opinion she received prior to making up her mind.

Freedom Front Plus Member of Parliament Corner Mulder questioned Mapisa-Nqakula in a bid to get clarity. “Speaker, I have raised my hand, I just want to make sure if you say the vote will be open it means it won’t be a secret ballot? And secondly, you are also saying the whips will pronounce on behalf of members and members will not pronounce openly themselves in terms of the way they vote?

“My understanding has always been that if we vote, the Whips will pronounce on the votes. However, if there is anyone who wants to vote differently from the position of their parties, members will be free to do so.”

No secret ballot in the vote of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa and his Cabinet:

↯↯↯Read More On The Topic On TDPel Media ↯↯↯