Rising Concerns Over American XL Bully Dogs
Recent Incidents Spark Concern In recent months, American XL bully dogs have made headlines due to several incidents involving humans and other animals. The Prime Minister expressed his shared concern with the nation over these incidents, characterizing it as a “pattern of behavior” that cannot be tolerated.
Tragic Dog Attack in Walsall Coinciding with this concern, a tragic dog attack occurred in Walsall, resulting in a man’s death. Authorities are working to determine the breed of the dog involved in this incident.
Series of Disturbing Incidents The recent incidents involving XL bully dogs include the killing of pregnant sheep on a farm near Wrexham on March 22 and an attack on an 11-year-old girl and a man in Birmingham on September 9.
Understanding American Bully XL Dogs
Origin and Development American bullies, including the XL variety, are believed to have emerged in the late 1980s through the crossbreeding of American Staffordshire terriers and pitbull terriers. Over time, they have been further bred with various other breeds to enhance their muscular characteristics.
Classification There are four main types of American bullies: standard, pocket, classic, and XL.
Assessing the Danger Posed by American Bullies
Potentially Dangerous Breed American bullies have been associated with numerous devastating attacks over the years. According to NHS consultant surgeon Richard Baker, their powerful jaws and gripping behavior result in wounds that are often more severe than those caused by other breeds. The injuries can include bone fractures, skin tearing, and nerve damage, which may lead to ongoing pain.
Prospects of a Ban in the UK
Existing Breed Bans The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 in the UK has already banned four dog breeds: American pitbull terrier, Japanese tosa, Dogo Argentinos, and Fila Brasileiro. This act empowers the government to ban breeds that appear to be bred for fighting or exhibit characteristics of such breeds.
Complexity of Banning XL Bullies The XL bully breed, not officially recognized by the Kennel Club and difficult to define due to extensive crossbreeding, raises concerns that a ban could inadvertently affect other breeds. Various charities, including Battersea, the Dogs Trust, and the Kennel Club, argue against breed-specific bans, citing their ineffectiveness.
Debate Over Breed Bans The Dog Control Coalition, formed by these charities, contends that breed-specific bans have not reduced dog bites or fatalities over the past three decades, suggesting an alternative approach is needed. However, those who have witnessed the aftermath of dog attacks, like Mr. Baker, maintain that owning a dog bred for violence is unnecessary and potentially dangerous.
Impact of the Ban on Dog Owners
Consequences of the Dangerous Dogs Act The Dangerous Dogs Act of 1991 prohibits the possession or custody of dogs bred for combat. If someone owns a banned dog, authorities can seize the dog. The breed and potential risk to the public are determined by a police or council dog expert. The dog may either be released or kept in a kennel during a court application process. Visiting the dog during this period may not be allowed.