Disbursement Channels: HHS and USAID
According to the pro-life summary, a significant portion of funding was channeled through the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). These entities played a pivotal role in fund distribution.
Hyde and Helms Amendments’ Scope
The caucus highlighted that while federal funds weren’t directly allocated for abortions under the Hyde and Helms amendments, they emphasized a crucial distinction.
These amendments did not impose limitations on funding directed towards abortion providers, as noted by the group.
Amplifying Abortion Advocates’ Influence
Stressing the impact of federal funding, the caucus expressed concerns about the broadened reach and influence of abortion advocates.
They argued that supporting abortion providers through federal funding indirectly endorses and expands the agenda of abortion advocates.
Planned Parenthood’s Funding Composition
The report revealed Planned Parenthood’s substantial financial support, nearing $2 billion, sourced from diverse federal avenues.
While Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements formed the major portion, additional contributions included grants, cooperative agreements, and loans forgiven via the Paycheck Protection Program during the COVID era.
Surge in Planned Parenthood’s Federal Funding
Highlighting a notable surge, the caucus emphasized a $170 million increase in federal funding for Planned Parenthood from 2019 to 2021.
This growth, as stated in the recent GAO report, indicates a significant upswing in federal support within a brief timeframe.
Global Abortion Groups: IPPF and MSI
The pro-life caucus shed light on the federal funding received by global abortion groups—IPPF and MSI. Over the reviewed years, IPPF reportedly received around $2 million, while MSI garnered approximately $1.3 million in federal funding. These organizations are known for conducting millions of abortions worldwide annually.
Health News