...By Gift BADEWO for TDPel Media.
Slippery Starmer’s gender extremism stance
Slippery Starmer, leader of the Labour Party in the UK, had been struggling to define the term “woman” and answer whether a woman can have a penis.
This became a problem for him after the downfall of former Scottish First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon.
He then decided to publicly reset and give an interview with The Sunday Times.
However, the result of this interview turned into a public relations disaster when he was asked about women and penises.
Starmer’s stance
When asked on a train journey from Plymouth to London whether a woman can have a penis, Starmer’s answer was that for 99.9 per cent of women, it is completely biological and, of course, they haven’t got a penis.
However, his inability to define what a biological woman is poses a serious problem for women’s rights.
Importance of defining a biological woman
If you cannot define what a biological woman is, it becomes impossible to protect their rights.
This includes ensuring single-sex spaces for their protection and the ability to compete in sports with others who have the same biological characteristics.
Lesson for woke leaders
This situation highlights why woke leaders are currently eating themselves.
Slippery Starmer’s stance on gender extremism poses a serious threat to the rights of biological women, which are already under attack.
Thus, it is impossible to trust him to protect these rights if he continues to hold such views.
Conclusion
As long as Slippery Starmer believes that a woman can have a penis, it is impossible to trust him to protect the rights of biological women.
This is a serious problem and means that he must never become Prime Minister.
