The Conservative Party has called for reductions in Britain’s growing welfare payments, including benefits for those with anxiety, to free up funds for increased defence spending.
Shadow Defence Secretary, James Cartlidge, highlighted the urgent need for the UK to become “more resilient” in the face of rising security threats.
The Tories are eyeing the welfare and foreign aid budgets as potential areas to save money, allowing for greater investment in the military.
Rising Pressure on Defence Budget
With the return of Donald Trump as US President, pressure has mounted on the UK government to boost its military expenditure.
Trump has urged NATO allies to contribute 5% of their GDP to defence and warned that America would no longer take full responsibility for Europe’s security.
Amid this, Labour has also committed to increasing military spending, but with no clear timeline.
The Tories have proposed an ambitious target of 2.5% of GDP by 2030, to be funded through cuts to the civil service and other spending areas.
Defence Spending and Welfare Cuts: What’s at Stake?
Cartlidge has pointed to the sharp increase in the number of people claiming disability benefits, including those for mental health conditions such as anxiety, as a factor that needs to be addressed.
He argued that, since the end of the Cold War, Britain has used the “peace dividend” to fund growing welfare costs rather than investing in military power.
The Tories suggest that welfare cuts are essential for funding a stronger defence capability, especially as global security concerns escalate.
The Case for Hard Power Over Soft Power
In his interview with the BBC, Cartlidge emphasized the need to prioritize “hard power”—military strength—over “soft power,” which includes foreign aid.
While he acknowledged the importance of foreign aid in stabilizing vulnerable countries, he stated that the UK’s security could no longer rely on these programs alone.
The Tories argue that funding for the military must be prioritized to protect national security, even if it means making difficult cuts to welfare and aid programs.
Welfare Spending Under Scrutiny
Although Cartlidge didn’t specify which welfare benefits would be targeted, he stressed the need for a more sustainable approach to welfare spending.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies recently reported that the number of working-age people claiming health-related benefits has risen sharply, with projections suggesting that more than one in ten people could be claiming these benefits by 2028.
The Tories argue that a welfare system that keeps growing is incompatible with the need for increased defence spending.
Labour’s Defence Spending Plans
Labour, while agreeing that defence spending needs to increase, has yet to commit to a specific timeline.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson indicated that Labour’s 2.5% GDP target for defence spending is ambitious but achievable.
However, she also pointed out the difficult financial legacy left by the Conservatives, referencing a £22 billion deficit that needs to be addressed before any major investments can be made in defence.
A Need for Realistic Solutions
As security concerns continue to rise globally, both major parties are grappling with how to balance domestic welfare needs with the requirement to protect national security.
The Tories’ proposal to cut welfare and aid spending is controversial but underscores the growing sense of urgency around defence funding.
As global threats evolve, both the government and opposition face mounting pressure to find a sustainable solution that ensures Britain remains safe while also addressing the needs of its citizens.
This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn