Top Premier League clubs push back against centralised advertising scheme expected to generate £750 million amid fears of sponsor clashes in England

The Premier League’s ambitious plan to centralise pitch-side advertising could bring in a staggering £750 million annually—but not everyone is cheering.

Some of the league’s elite teams, collectively known as the ‘Big Six’, have expressed serious reservations about the proposal, fearing it may not benefit them and could create conflicts with existing sponsors.

What the Proposal Entails

At a recent shareholder meeting, league officials outlined a plan inspired by US sports leagues, where the league negotiates advertising deals on behalf of clubs.

The proposal suggests selling 60% of pitch-side advertising centrally and increasing the number of top-tier partners from seven to ten.

According to insiders, the extra revenue would then be split among all 20 Premier League clubs, with individual amounts determined by a variety of factors, including club size, viewership, and commercial influence.

While the league argues this approach could open a new revenue stream, elite clubs are sceptical.

Their concern is that they already invest heavily in commercial departments and feel their expertise surpasses what the league can offer.

Big Six Concerns

The Daily Mail Sport understands that Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Tottenham, and Liverpool have all harboured doubts.

United, for example, are said to be listening but remain unconvinced that the centralised model would benefit them or the league as a whole. City reportedly share similar reservations.

One chief executive at the meeting also flagged the potential for conflicts of interest.

A central deal with, say, an automotive sponsor could clash with existing club partnerships in the same industry, potentially jeopardising long-standing agreements.

Opportunity for Smaller Clubs

Not every club is opposed.

Smaller teams may see the centralisation as a way to leverage the league’s overall brand and the appeal of bigger clubs to secure more revenue.

For them, this model could provide a lifeline and a chance to close the financial gap between themselves and the top earners.

Premier League’s Position

League insiders stress that any move would be aimed at benefiting all clubs.

They claim to have conducted detailed internal analysis and consulted commercial experts, insisting that proposals would not be pushed if they weren’t in members’ best interests.

Currently, clubs can display five minutes of advertising on pitch-side boards during matches, three of which go to broadcasters when fixtures are televised.

The new plan would expand these opportunities considerably.

Lessons from Past Resistance

This isn’t the first time top clubs have pushed back against Premier League initiatives.

Last season, United and City joined forces to oppose a system called “anchoring,” which effectively would have introduced a salary cap based on prize money and broadcast revenue for the team finishing bottom.

Despite early league support, the proposal was ultimately rejected in November after intense lobbying from the clubs.

What’s Next?

The Premier League is expected to continue discussions with clubs before moving forward with any formal proposals.

While smaller clubs may advocate for the change, the league will need to address concerns from its highest-earning members if the plan is to gain traction.

Negotiations are likely to be delicate, balancing potential revenue growth with preserving club autonomy and avoiding sponsor conflicts.

Summary

The Premier League’s centralised advertising proposal could generate an eye-watering £750 million annually, but top clubs remain cautious.

While smaller sides see opportunity, the Big Six are wary of potential conflicts and doubt the league’s ability to match their commercial expertise.

History shows that the Premier League has faced pushback before, and this plan could spark another round of high-stakes negotiations before any agreement is reached.