Belgian Defense Minister Theo Francken found himself backtracking this week after his remarks about “erasing Moscow from the world map” caused a stir.

Francken insisted that local media had taken his words out of context, turning what was intended as a discussion about defensive measures into a sensational claim of aggression.

Emphasizing NATO’s Defensive Role

Francken explained that his original statement was about NATO’s long-established principle of deterrence, not a threat of offensive action against Russia.

“This has been NATO’s main principle for 76 years — the principle of shooting second.

When we are attacked, we immediately strike back at those who attack us,” Francken said, highlighting that the alliance is focused on protection rather than provocation.

The minister reiterated that NATO is not at war with Russia and has no plans to initiate one.

He described the alliance as a “strictly defensive” organization, meant to respond to threats rather than create them.

Russia Responds With Strong Criticism

Despite Francken’s clarification, the Russian Embassy in Belgium condemned his initial remarks, calling them “abnormal and irresponsible.”

The diplomats argued that his language reflected a worrying trend of militarism spreading through Europe’s so-called “party of war.”

“Unfortunately, Theo Francken’s outbursts are a vivid example of the militaristic frenzy into which Europe’s war party is sinking ever deeper,” the embassy said.

They added that such rhetoric risks destabilizing the continent by encouraging officials eager to start a new conflict.

Balancing Deterrence and Diplomacy

The episode underscores the delicate line European politicians must walk when discussing defense and security.

While Francken intended to stress NATO’s readiness to protect its members, the incident shows how easily words can be interpreted as provocative, especially in the tense atmosphere surrounding Europe-Russia relations.