...By Gift BADEWO for TDPel Media.
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of 94-Year-Old Woman in Property Seizure Case
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of 94-year-old Geraldine Tyler, who had her home seized by Hennepin County in Minnesota and sold to cover unpaid real estate taxes.
The court declared the county’s actions unconstitutional, stating that it violated Tyler’s rights by taking her property without providing fair compensation.
The case has significant implications for property rights and tax forfeiture laws.
Property Seizure and Sale
Geraldine Tyler, a Minneapolis resident, owned a condo in Hennepin County that incurred approximately $15,000 in unpaid real estate taxes, stemming from an initial debt of $2,300.
In 2015, the county seized Tyler’s condo and sold it for $40,000, pocketing an additional $25,000 beyond her tax debt.
Supreme Court Ruling and Constitutional Rights
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court, emphasized the constitutional violations committed by the county.
The ruling stated that the county exceeded its authority by seizing more property than was necessary to satisfy the tax debt.
It was deemed a violation of Tyler’s Fifth Amendment right to just compensation and the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against excessive fines.
Impact on Property Rights and Home Equity Theft
Minnesota is one of several states highlighted for engaging in home equity theft, according to the Pacific Legal Foundation, the non-profit law firm representing Tyler.
The foundation noted that thousands of homes have been sold due to unpaid taxes, leaving former owners with minimal or no compensation.
The ruling brings attention to the need for reform in property tax forfeiture laws across these states.
Tyler’s Case and Future Proceedings
Tyler’s case will now proceed to the trial court, where she will argue for fair market value compensation, minus her debt.
The specifics behind Tyler’s cessation of property tax payments when she moved from the condo have not been explained.
The court rejected the county’s arguments that alternative options were available to Tyler, such as selling the property, refinancing her mortgage, or enrolling in a tax payment plan.
Revisions to Property Tax Forfeiture Laws
In response to the Supreme Court ruling, Dan Rogan, an Assistant County Administrator and Hennepin County Auditor, acknowledged the need for revisions to Minnesota’s property tax forfeiture laws.
Hennepin County expressed its intention to work closely with the Minnesota Legislature to develop a process that aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision.
