Retirement planning can feel like standing at a crossroads, especially when you’ve worked for years in a defined benefit pension scheme.
One reader recently wrote in with a dilemma that many approaching 60 might relate to.
They have a local authority pension and are weighing up whether to take a smaller monthly pension with a bigger lump sum or stick with a higher regular income and a smaller upfront payment.
The numbers are eye-catching: a £15,000 lump sum with £1,144 per month in pension, or a £64,000 lump sum with just £800 per month.
The big question: can the bigger lump sum generate enough income to match the higher monthly pension?
How Commuting Pension Works
One of the perks of defined benefit pensions is the option to take part of your retirement savings as a tax-free lump sum.
There’s a lifetime limit of £268,275 for tax-free withdrawals, but if this is your main pension, that’s not an immediate concern.
Many schemes, like local authority pensions, allow flexibility: you can accept a lower monthly pension in exchange for a bigger lump sum.
The challenge is deciding the right balance between cash upfront and steady income.
Understanding the Commutation Factor
It’s important to grasp the “commutation factor,” which shows how much pension you give up for each pound of lump sum.
In the reader’s case, taking the extra £49,000 lump sum costs them £344 per month in pension.
That works out to a ratio of 12:1 – for every £12 in lump sum, £1 of annual pension is sacrificed.
This is considered a steep trade-off. Why? Because life expectancy comes into play.
At 60, a woman in average health might live 27 more years.
Giving up £344 a month for 27 years in return for a £49,000 lump sum means the pension lost over retirement outweighs the upfront gain.
Add inflation adjustments, and the effective loss grows even larger.
Can the Lump Sum Replace Lost Pension Income?
Many people wonder if investing the lump sum could replace the forgone monthly pension.
For example, using the £64,000 to buy an annuity that rises roughly with inflation might generate about £250 per month, far short of the £344 monthly pension given up.
Even after considering taxes, the income falls short.
So mathematically, the higher lump sum option doesn’t fully compensate for the lost pension income – but numbers aren’t the whole story.
Considering Your Retirement Priorities
The best balance between lump sum and monthly pension depends on your personal situation:
-
Immediate capital needs: If you have high-interest debts, a bigger lump sum could make sense.
-
Lifestyle goals: Want to take a dream holiday, renovate your home, or help family members financially early in retirement? A larger upfront payment may give you that flexibility.
-
Security and steady income: If you rely on monthly income to cover ongoing living costs, rent, or rising expenses, a higher pension provides long-term peace of mind.
Your pension, housing situation, state pension, and other income streams all factor into the choice.
Bottom Line: It Depends
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. In schemes like local government pensions, the cost of boosting the lump sum is high.
Yet, for some, having cash on hand for early retirement adventures or family support can outweigh the numerical loss in long-term income.
Choosing the right mix is a personal decision that balances immediate financial needs with long-term security.
Need Personalized Guidance?
Steve Webb, former pensions minister and This Is Money’s pension adviser, is available to answer questions from readers.
While he can’t provide individual financial advice, he offers guidance to help you understand the trade-offs.
You can email Steve at pensionquestions@thisismoney.co.uk. Always include a daytime contact number.
For additional assistance, the Government-backed MoneyHelper service offers free guidance on pensions at 0800 011 3797.