President Donald Trump Explores Options to Acquire Greenland Including Military Measures in the United States

President Donald Trump Explores Options to Acquire Greenland Including Military Measures in the United States

People around the world woke up to news that the White House is once more talking about Greenland — and not just in passing.

The administration under President Donald Trump is exploring various ways the United States could gain control of the vast Arctic island, including diplomatic deals, negotiations, or even potentially sending in the military — though officials stress they prefer peaceful solutions.

Why Greenland Matters to the U.S.

According to the White House, Greenland isn’t just some distant land — it’s a strategic priority.

Officials say its location in the Arctic makes it critical for deterring rivals like Russia and China and for broader national security goals.

Trump’s team says they’re discussing a “range of options” to pursue that goal, and that using the U.S. military “is always an option at the commander‑in‑chief’s disposal,” even if that isn’t the preferred path.

Allies Push Back Hard

The idea of the U.S. grabbing a territory that’s part of NATO ally Denmark has set off alarm bells overseas.

European leaders from countries like France, Germany, the U.K. and Denmark itself have rallied behind Greenland — saying clearly that decisions about the island belong to Greenlanders and Denmark, not the United States.

Leaders say that any attempt at a takeover — military or otherwise — could seriously strain relations among NATO members and destabilize long‑standing cooperation.

What Trump’s Team Says Internally

Inside the U.S. government, officials tell lawmakers that the talk of military options isn’t a signal of an imminent invasion, but rather part of a broad set of ideas being reviewed.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly told congressional leaders that the real goal is to negotiate a peaceful purchase or a special association agreement, not to storm the island by force.

Other advisers have floated the idea of something like a Compact of Free Association — a type of partnership that stops short of full U.S. annexation but increases ties.

Greenland and Denmark Make Their Position Clear

Every time this idea resurfaces, Greenlandic and Danish officials repeat the same message: Greenland is not for sale.

They insist the future of the island should be decided by its people, not negotiated away in Washington.

Some lawmakers in the U.S., including Republicans and Democrats, have also criticized the rhetoric — arguing that threatening a NATO ally and undermining its sovereignty is deeply problematic.

The Bigger Picture

The renewed focus on Greenland follows a series of bold U.S. foreign policy moves — including a controversial operation in Venezuela that captured its president.

That event, and Trump’s repeated statements about American dominance in geopolitical hotspots, have helped fuel this latest push.

For now, White House officials say the discussion about Greenland is ongoing and likely to continue through the rest of Trump’s term — with diplomacy and negotiation still described as the first options on the table.

Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn