In an unexpected twist during a Premier League match between Bournemouth and Chelsea, referee Robert Jones found himself at the center of controversy after a decision involving Bournemouth’s David Brooks.

The situation unfolded when Brooks appeared to clothesline Chelsea’s Marc Cucurella during a heated 1-1 draw at Stamford Bridge.

The incident led to a tense moment where the referee had to decide whether the action warranted a red card, making this a significant moment in Premier League officiating.

The Role of VAR in the Controversial Decision

The responsibility to review the incident was handed to VAR official Graham Scott, who instructed Jones to go to the pitch-side monitor for a closer look.

It was at this moment that Scott told Jones, “It’s in your gift,” giving him the authority to choose between a yellow card, a red card, or no action at all.

This phrase is commonly used by PGMOL (Professional Game Match Officials Limited) officials when all options are available for the referee to decide, and the final call rests with the official on the field.

Jones’ Final Call and the Backlash

After reviewing the footage, Jones opted for a yellow card for Brooks, sparking an angry response from Bournemouth manager Enzo Maresca.

The decision to avoid a red card left many fans questioning whether it was the right call, especially as some supporters believed that Cucurella’s hair had been pulled during the incident.

The decision ultimately led to a tense post-match atmosphere, with Maresca voicing his displeasure in the press conference.

VAR Communication and Referee Autonomy

The phrase “It’s in your gift” was intended to emphasize that the final decision rested entirely with Jones.

Refereeing sources have clarified that this wording is often used in such scenarios, ensuring that the referee has the autonomy to make a judgment without external pressure.

In situations like these, the official on the pitch has the discretion to choose the appropriate action, whether that’s issuing a yellow card, a red card, or taking no action at all.

The Potential for Transparency in Future Broadcasts

As the debate continues, fans might get a chance to hear the full exchange between Scott and Jones if the incident is featured in the next “Match Officials Mic’d Up” show, which is hosted by PGMOL’s Howard Webb.

This could offer a deeper insight into the referee’s decision-making process, although it remains to be seen whether Jones’ choice to issue just a yellow card will be supported after further internal review.

A Dramatic Match and a Controversial Decision

The match itself carried on with plenty of drama.

Bournemouth initially took a 2-1 lead, but Chelsea fought back in stoppage time when Reece James scored a stunning 25-yard free-kick to equalize and prevent a loss.

Despite the controversy surrounding the red card decision, the game ended in a dramatic 2-2 draw.

Referees’ Unique Language and Terminology

In the world of officiating, referees often communicate using specific language and terms that might be unfamiliar to the general public.

For example, the term “ghosting” is used to describe the moment when the ball has already been kicked by a player.

These terms are part of the unique jargon used by referees to describe different aspects of their decision-making process and the events unfolding on the field.

This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!

Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn