Migrants detained under Labour’s one in one out scheme claim severe physical and psychological harm and urge UN to probe Home Office practices in the United Kingdom

Migrants detained under Labour’s one in one out scheme claim severe physical and psychological harm and urge UN to probe Home Office practices in the United Kingdom

Far from the headlines about border control and policy announcements, a group of migrants held in UK detention centres say their everyday reality has been one of pain, fear, and neglect.

Detainees caught up in Labour’s much-debated “one in, one out” agreement are now appealing beyond Britain, urging the United Nations to step in and examine how they say they have been treated while awaiting deportation.

Inside Harmondsworth: Allegations From Detained Migrants

Roughly 80 migrants have jointly documented their experiences at Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre, located near Heathrow Airport and used as a temporary holding site for people facing removal to France.

According to their account, detention began almost immediately after they arrived in the UK via small boat crossings, leaving no room to recover from the dangerous Channel journey or to contact loved ones.

The migrants, who travelled from countries including Sudan, Afghanistan, and Iran, say their hope was simple: to find safety and a chance at a peaceful life.

Instead, they claim their first encounter with the UK system involved harsh treatment by Home Office authorities.

Claims of Abuse, Neglect, and Psychological Trauma

In their report, detainees accuse officials of arbitrary detention, restricted access to lawyers, poor medical attention, and degrading treatment.

They allege that illnesses went untreated and that mental health struggles such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia were widespread inside the centre.

Some of the most serious claims relate to mental health emergencies.

The document describes incidents of self-harm attempts and says detainees experiencing emotional breakdowns were sometimes isolated or placed in disciplinary units.

According to the group, this created an atmosphere of constant fear and hopelessness, leaving many feeling stripped of dignity and invisible.

A Call for International Scrutiny

Believing their rights have been violated, the migrants are calling on the United Nations and global human rights organisations to investigate conditions at UK detention centres used under the deportation scheme.

They argue that their treatment breaches basic human rights principles, particularly those linked to dignity, due process, and humane care.

Government Tightens Grip With New Enforcement Powers

The accusations surface at a time when the UK government is expanding its enforcement toolkit.

New powers now allow officials to seize mobile phones from migrants arriving illegally, without first making an arrest.

At the Manston processing centre in Kent, officers can extract data from devices to gather intelligence on smuggling networks.

These measures are part of a broader effort to curb small-boat crossings and dismantle people-smuggling operations, following the passage of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act last month.

Harsher Penalties for Smuggling Networks

The new law introduces stiff criminal penalties aimed at disrupting organised migration routes.

Storing or supplying boat engines used to bring migrants into the UK can now carry prison sentences of up to 14 years.

Even researching departure points or sourcing dinghy equipment online could result in a five-year jail term if linked to smuggling activity.

Channel Crossings Still Near Record Levels

Despite the tougher stance, Channel crossings remain high.

Last year, 41,472 migrants made the journey, marking the second-highest total on record.

That figure represents a 13 per cent increase compared with 2024 and sits just below the all-time peak of 45,774 recorded in 2022.

One In, One Out: A Policy Under Fire

The first return flight to France under the “one in, one out” scheme this year is scheduled for Wednesday.

Yet the policy continues to attract criticism.

Detractors argue it has failed to deliver on its promise of balance, pointing to figures showing the UK has accepted slightly more migrants from France than it has sent back during the early months of the scheme.

Between September and December, 193 people who crossed the Channel illegally were returned, while 195 asylum seekers with no prior illegal entry attempts were allowed into the UK from France.

The Home Office had initially described the arrangement as involving equal numbers in both directions.

Diplomatic Setbacks and Political Embarrassment

The scheme marks another challenge for the agreement struck between Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron last summer.

Legal hurdles and awkward incidents — including cases where removed migrants later returned via small boats — have undermined confidence in the deal.

Home Office Pushes Back on the Allegations

The Home Office has firmly rejected the claims made by detainees.

Officials insist that all individuals are informed of their right to legal representation within 24 hours of arriving at a removal centre and are offered free legal advice sessions.

Detainees, they say, receive a triage appointment to help them connect with legal providers.

Authorities also state that detainees are given mobile phones, access to landlines or video calls on request, and five minutes of free international calls.

According to the Home Office, detention sites are equipped with round-the-clock healthcare teams, including mental health services, dental care, and substance misuse support.

Official Response and Border Priorities

A Home Office spokesperson said the department does not recognise the allegations regarding conditions at Harmondsworth, stressing that detainee welfare remains a top priority.

The spokesperson added that protecting the UK border is central to government policy, arguing that the “one in, one out” scheme is designed to disrupt criminal gangs by swiftly returning those who arrive illegally.

What’s Next?

As return flights resume and enforcement powers expand, pressure is building from both sides — migrants seeking international intervention and a government determined to show control of its borders.

Whether an external investigation will follow, or whether the policy itself will be reshaped, remains an open question in an increasingly heated migration debate.

Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn