The discussion surrounding compensation for Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) has once again ignited controversy.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer faced backlash for dismissing calls to award billions in compensation to women affected by changes to the state pension age.
Starmer defended his decision, citing the burden it would place on taxpayers, despite previous Labour pledges to support these women.
Promises Made, Promises Broken?
During the 2019 general election, Labour pledged a significant £58 billion in compensation for WASPI women—those born in the 1950s who were not properly notified about the increase in their state pension age.
Even as recently as 2022, Starmer voiced support for compensation. Fast-forward to today, and that support appears to have vanished.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced the government’s decision to reject a report from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).
The report recommended compensation ranging between £1,000 and £2,950 per person, costing up to £10.5 billion.
Kendall argued that most women were already aware of the changes and had not suffered direct financial loss.
The Ombudsman’s Findings
The PHSO report found significant maladministration on the part of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
It revealed that women affected by the state pension age increase should have received at least 28 months’ advance notice.
This delay, the report argued, prevented many from adequately planning their retirement.
Despite these findings, Kendall stood firm.
She insisted that the vast majority—73% of affected women—were aware of the changes, undermining the Ombudsman’s conclusions.
The government, therefore, deemed compensation both costly and unfair to taxpayers.
Starmer’s Justification: A Tough Call
Speaking during a visit to Estonia, Starmer acknowledged the frustrations of WASPI women but defended the decision.
He highlighted the Ombudsman’s acknowledgment of no “direct financial injustice” while stressing the need to balance public finances.
“I understand their concerns,” Starmer said, “but imposing such a burden on taxpayers is not something I believe is right at this moment.”
Outrage from WASPI Campaigners
Unsurprisingly, campaigners were furious. Angela Madden, Chair of WASPI, condemned the government’s response as a “bizarre and unjustified” rejection of an independent watchdog’s findings.
Madden argued that ignoring the Ombudsman’s recommendations undermines the entire process.
“This is a decision that would make the likes of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump blush,” Madden said, criticizing the government’s refusal to provide meaningful compensation.
What’s Next for WASPI Women?
With the government closing the door on compensation, the battle for justice is far from over.
Madden urged Parliament to take action and explore alternative solutions.
Meanwhile, Liz Kendall promised reforms to ensure better communication of future changes to the state pension age.
She outlined plans for an “action plan” that would use modern communication methods to notify affected individuals in advance.
For WASPI women, however, this promise of improved processes offers little comfort.
Campaigners remain determined to keep the issue on the political agenda, pushing for accountability and fair compensation for those who feel let down.
Conclusion: A Divisive Outcome
The decision to reject compensation has left millions of women feeling betrayed, and the government accused of ignoring the findings of its own independent watchdog.
While Starmer and Kendall argue the decision is fiscally responsible, WASPI campaigners see it as an injustice that cannot go unchallenged.
The road ahead remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the WASPI women are not giving up their fight for fair treatment.
This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn