Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema has sparked controversy once again, this time drawing criticism from the United States over his use of the anti-apartheid chant, “Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer.”
His performance of the song on Human Rights Day has reignited global debate about its meaning and impact.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was among those condemning the chant, calling it a dangerous and provocative message that puts South African minorities at risk.
He took to social media platform X to express his concerns, stating that the chant incites violence and that South African leaders should take steps to protect Afrikaner and other vulnerable communities.
Rubio also mentioned that the United States is open to offering refuge to those affected by such threats.
Political Analyst Urges Sensitivity
Professor Lesiba Teffo, a respected political analyst, weighed in on the issue, urging Malema and the EFF to reconsider using the controversial song.
He pointed out that while he personally lived through apartheid, many of those who now debate its history only learned about it secondhand.
Teffo emphasized that while history should not be forgotten, South Africa must move forward.
He stressed that people are more concerned about essential issues like food security, employment, and public safety.
According to him, leaders who fail to prioritize these needs will struggle to gain public support.
Malema Stands His Ground
Despite mounting criticism, including opposition from high-profile figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk, Malema remains defiant.
He has vowed to continue singing the chant, arguing that it is part of South Africa’s historical struggle against oppression.
Should the Chant Be Banned?
The ongoing debate raises a crucial question: Should “Kill the Boer” be prohibited, or does it hold cultural and historical significance?