What began as a tense policing decision around a high-profile football match has now spiraled into a legal and political storm that doesn’t look like it’s ending anytime soon.
Craig Guildford’s departure as West Midlands Police chief constable may have been framed as a retirement, but behind the scenes, the fallout is growing louder—and more complicated.
Craig Guildford Weighs Legal Action After Stepping Down
Just a day after leaving his role, Craig Guildford is already exploring the possibility of taking legal action against his former employer.
The 52-year-old is consulting lawyers about a potential claim for constructive dismissal, a move that could result in a payout reportedly exceeding £600,000.
Sources close to the former chief constable say the idea of constructive dismissal is very much on his radar.
With nearly three years left on a lucrative contract—worth about £288,700 annually, including a £215,300 salary—Guildford is said to be seeking what has been described as a “significant payout.”
Retirement With Full Pension Sparks Backlash
Guildford’s exit came with full pension benefits after approval from West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner Simon Foster, who also praised him for acting with “honour” by stepping aside.
That praise has not gone down well with critics, especially given the circumstances surrounding his departure.
The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, had publicly said she lost confidence in Guildford days earlier.
Despite pressure from MPs and senior government figures, he resisted calls to resign before eventually retiring.
The Match at the Center of the Storm
At the heart of the controversy lies the handling of the Aston Villa versus Maccabi Tel Aviv match in Birmingham last November.
An official report by Chief Inspector of Constabulary Sir Andy Cooke found that police had exaggerated and, in some cases, fabricated evidence to justify banning Israeli fans from attending the game.
Those findings have since raised serious questions about leadership, judgment, and transparency within West Midlands Police during Guildford’s tenure.
Misconduct Investigation Still on the Table
While Guildford may be considering legal action, his plans could be complicated by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
The watchdog confirmed it is reviewing the inspectorate’s report and made it clear that Guildford’s retirement does not bring scrutiny to an end.
IOPC director general Rachel Watson stressed that investigators are examining extensive evidence and have requested additional materials.
If misconduct is identified, she said, action will follow—raising the possibility of a formal investigation that could delay or derail any lawsuit.
Political Reactions Turn Sharply Divided
Reaction from politicians has been swift and deeply divided.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has already filed a formal complaint with the IOPC, arguing that Guildford’s conduct around the match may amount to gross misconduct.
He described it as “totally outrageous” that Guildford is now consulting lawyers after blaming a “political and media frenzy” for his exit.
On the other side, independent MP for Villa Park Ayoub Khan defended the former chief constable, calling his retirement “one of the greatest injustices of our time” and arguing that Guildford was punished for doing his job rather than failing at it.
Praise, Condemnation, and Conflicting Messages
Simon Foster, the local PCC and the only official with the authority to sack Guildford, stood firmly by his decision, highlighting what he described as the chief constable’s many achievements and contributions.
In contrast, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch took a far tougher stance, arguing that Guildford should have been dismissed outright rather than allowed to retire.
She criticized both the Labour PCC and the Home Secretary for not taking decisive action sooner, saying it was unacceptable for a chief constable to mislead Parliament and remain in office.
Trust in Policing Takes a Hit
National Police Chiefs’ Council chair Gavin Stephens acknowledged the broader damage caused by the controversy.
He admitted that the inspectorate’s findings and the intense parliamentary scrutiny have been deeply harmful to public confidence in policing.
Shabana Mahmood echoed that sentiment, describing the inspector’s report as “damning” and saying it outlined a series of failures that eroded trust in West Midlands Police.
From her perspective, Guildford stepping down was the right call.
Guildford Breaks His Silence
In his own words, Craig Guildford said the relentless political and media pressure had begun to overshadow the work of officers and staff across the region.
He framed his decision to leave as an effort to protect the force and allow it to move forward without distraction.
What Happens Next?
With a possible misconduct investigation looming and legal action being weighed, the story is far from over.
Whether Guildford proceeds with a constructive dismissal claim—or whether watchdog scrutiny changes the course entirely—remains to be seen.
One thing is clear: his exit has opened a new chapter that could reshape accountability at the highest levels of British policing.
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn