Could Donald Trump’s interest in acquiring Greenland be just the beginning? According to Massachusetts Representative Seth Moulton, the former president’s fascination with territorial expansion could lead to even more ambitious—and controversial—moves.
During a recent CNN interview, Moulton raised concerns that Trump might set his sights on countries like Poland or India next, calling such ideas “absurd” and “a dumb way to conduct foreign policy.”
A Hypothetical Takeover?
Moulton didn’t hold back when questioning Trump’s logic.
“If he’s so worried about Russia, does he want to take over Poland?” he asked.
“If he’s worried about China, does that mean he wants to take over India? Or maybe Mongolia, since it’s between the two?” The congressman dismissed the entire notion as impractical, emphasizing that this is not how the United States operates.
Trump’s Justification for Greenland
Moulton’s remarks came in response to Trump’s recent comments about Greenland.
Speaking to reporters, Trump insisted that the U.S. “has to have” Greenland for national security reasons.
He pointed to the increasing presence of Russian and Chinese ships in Arctic waters, claiming that Denmark isn’t equipped to handle the potential threats.
“We’re not just talking about U.S. security; this is about world peace,” Trump stated during a press briefing.
Real Threat or Overreaction?
CNN host Jessica Dean played Trump’s remarks for Moulton and asked whether there was any validity to these concerns.
Moulton acknowledged that Russia and China’s growing interest in the Arctic is a real issue but argued that climate change is the driving force behind it.
“As the ice melts, new shipping routes are opening up, and Russia is taking full advantage by building more bases in the region,” he explained.
A Risk to National Security?
The congressman also criticized Trump’s approach, suggesting that it could actually weaken national security rather than strengthen it. “America’s greatest strength is our allies,” Moulton said.
“If they don’t trust us, they won’t stand with us when we need them. That makes America much less safe.”
The Alternative Approach
Instead of pursuing territorial expansion, Moulton argued that the U.S. should work with its allies.
“For decades, the U.S. has tackled national security threats by enlisting our allies’ help,” he said. “We simply don’t have the resources to be everywhere at once.”
Vice President Vance Visits Greenland
Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance recently traveled to Greenland, further fueling speculation about Trump’s interest in the territory.
Speaking at a U.S. military base on the island, Vance echoed Trump’s concerns about Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic.
However, he reassured that the U.S. was not considering military force to claim the land.
“The president believes Greenland is vital not just for U.S. security, but for global stability and the people of Greenland themselves,” Vance stated.
However, his visit wasn’t entirely smooth—local protests forced him to cancel a planned trip to a traditional dog-sled race.
What’s Next for Greenland?
Vance suggested that Greenland might eventually gain independence from Denmark, at which point the U.S. could enter discussions about its future.
“We believe the people of Greenland will choose their own path, and we’ll have conversations with them from there,” he said.
What remains unclear is how Greenland would financially sustain itself without Denmark’s substantial subsidies.
A Controversial Path Forward
As debates over Trump’s vision for national security continue, one thing is certain—his interest in Greenland is far from over.
Whether this strategy strengthens or jeopardizes America’s global standing remains a hotly contested issue.