In South Africa, the role of young people in shaping national conversations has been under the spotlight this week.
The ANC Youth League (ANCYL) recently issued an apology after initially dismissing the National Convention in dismissive terms, calling it a “tea party.”
Their latest statements, however, underline a renewed commitment to engaging in the ongoing National Dialogue.
ANCYL Responds to Criticism
At a media briefing in Johannesburg, ANCYL leaders, including President Malatji and Secretary-General Mntuwoxolo Ngudle, openly criticised the convention for being a gathering of friends rather than a fully representative forum.
Ngudle even hinted that the Youth League might collaborate with other youth organisations to create a parallel youth-focused dialogue.
A Clarification and Apology
Following the backlash, the ANCYL released a statement clarifying its position.
The “tea party” comment, they explained, was an unfortunate remark born out of frustration over the exclusion of youth organisations that represent significant constituencies.
“These formations, with thousands of active members, are well-placed to articulate what needs to be done,” the statement said.
Secretary-General Ngudle emphasised that the league remains committed to meaningful youth participation in national discussions.
Emphasising the Issues That Matter
While reaffirming its support for the National Dialogue, the ANCYL criticised the convention for not adequately reflecting the voices of everyday South Africans.
They stressed that the dialogue must tackle pressing issues affecting the majority, such as gender-based violence, crime, migration, education reform, and the full implementation of the National Health Insurance (NHI).
The Youth League also committed to working with the preparatory task team and NEDLAC to ensure young people—who make up the majority of South Africa’s population—are meaningfully included in shaping these discussions.
ANC Welcomes Youth League’s Clarification
The ANC itself welcomed the ANCYL’s apology, emphasising alignment across party structures.
“We note the regrettable reference to the process as a ‘tea party’ and welcome the correction made by the Youth League,” the party stated.
The development highlights the ongoing negotiation between youth activism and institutional political processes, showing how young leaders are pushing to have their voices heard on national issues.
