Alice Evans Faces Court Defeat as Ioan Gruffudd Wins Five Year Restraining Order in Los Angeles

Alice Evans looked tense as she left a Los Angeles courtroom on Thursday, following a major legal win for her ex-husband, Ioan Gruffudd.

The judge renewed a domestic violence restraining order against Evans for five years, concluding a bitter court battle that has spanned years and drawn public attention.

Dressed in black with a patterned midi skirt and signature red lipstick, Evans kept her composure but her pursed lips and guarded posture hinted at the stress of the ruling.

Gruffudd, 52, also remained stoic during the announcement, sitting at the opposite end of the long courtroom table.

Neither spoke to reporters afterward.

Court Hearings Spotlight Years of Harassment

The legal drama began last week when Evans faced allegations of sustained online harassment against Gruffudd and his new wife, Bianca Wallace, 33.

The couple had already won a three-year restraining order against Evans in 2022.

On Wednesday, Evans admitted to posting defamatory content online targeting both Gruffudd and Wallace, offering apologies in court.

Despite her expressions of regret, Judge Michael Convey cited repeated violations of the prior restraining order.

He described Evans’ conduct as a “concerted, focused, intentional and caustic campaign of denigration” that left Gruffudd fearing for both his and Wallace’s safety, and even impacted his relationship with his daughters, Ella, 16, and Elsie, 12.

Judge Highlights Specific Incidents

Judge Convey drew attention to particularly alarming events, including Evans shouting at Gruffudd in front of their children and threatening him publicly.

She allegedly told the girls, “If daddy’s creepy with you let me know,” and warned Gruffudd she would “Amber Heard” him—references the judge called harassment and emotional abuse.

Another key incident involved Evans disclosing Wallace’s medical condition, multiple sclerosis, online, which caused the actress distress.

Judge Convey stated that while Evans’ online behavior had reduced in intensity, it was insufficient to demonstrate genuine responsibility or remorse.

Legal Teams Present Closing Arguments

Gruffudd’s attorney, Joseph Langlois, emphasized the “reasonable fear of future abuse” and cited repeated violations of the previous restraining order.

He described Evans’ actions as endangering both the couple and their children, warning that her social media posts could incite real-world violence from followers influenced by her statements.

Evans’ lawyer, Janina Verano, framed her client’s past behavior as a result of isolation, heartbreak, and emotional distress following the end of the marriage.

Verano argued that Evans had moved on, ceased posting abusive content, and deactivated her Twitter account.

She stressed that renewing the restraining order would continue to disrupt Evans’ ability to work, travel, and attend her children’s events.

Longstanding Divorce and Family Disputes

Gruffudd and Evans finalized their divorce in 2023 after splitting in early 2021.

Their relationship has remained acrimonious, particularly regarding spousal and child support.

Gruffudd married Wallace in April 2025, and the couple welcomed a daughter, Mila, in November.

Evans claims financial hardship and seeks increased spousal support, while Gruffudd asserts that he has overpaid and wants to stop spousal support entirely, citing Evans’ persistent abuse and violations of the restraining order.

Impact and Consequences

The renewed restraining order ensures that Evans must maintain a 100-foot distance from Gruffudd and Wallace.

Any violations could result in criminal prosecution.

Judge Convey recommended therapy for Evans and urged both parents to prioritize co-parenting, giving Gruffudd an opportunity to reconnect with his daughters after two years of limited contact.

What’s Next?

The trial continues into a second phase focused on financial and custody disputes.

The court will examine spousal support adjustments, child support, and the future of co-parenting arrangements.

Evans’ financial claims and Gruffudd’s allegations of parental alienation will play a central role in the upcoming hearings.

Summary

Alice Evans’ attempts at expressing remorse were not enough to prevent the court from renewing a five-year restraining order in favor of Ioan Gruffudd.

The judge highlighted a pattern of harassment, threats, and coercive control, emphasizing the need for therapy and the potential for criminal consequences if Evans violates the order.

The family conflict is set to continue as custody and support disputes enter the next stage.

Bulleted Takeaways

• Alice Evans appeared tense leaving Los Angeles court after ruling favored ex-husband Ioan Gruffudd.
• The judge renewed a five-year domestic violence restraining order citing repeated violations and harassment.
• Evans admitted to past online abuse but her expressions of remorse were deemed insufficient.
• Specific incidents included threats in front of their children and public disclosure of Wallace’s medical condition.
• Gruffudd’s legal team highlighted ongoing safety concerns; Evans’ attorney stressed emotional distress and personal growth.
• The second phase of the trial will focus on child and spousal support disputes, with custody arrangements under review.