World chess champion Magnus Carlsen’s bombshell claims of cheating against 19-year-old Hans Niemann have caused a rift in the sport: How can one be certain that his or her opponent is not cheating?
According to Maurice Ashley, the first Black Grandmaster of chess and a modern chess analyst, “Chess has entered the era of steroids.”
That is, everyone is left wondering who is playing fairly and who is not.
Ashley told Insider on Monday, “It’s extremely terrible that the game has reached this point.”
A scandal involving the world’s greatest chess player and an American prodigy has engulfed the chess community. In a surprise upset at the Sinquefield Cup in St. Louis, Missouri, Niemann defeated Carlsen in early September. Shortly thereafter, Carlsen withdrew from the event, announcing it on Twitter with a link to a YouTube video of then-Chelsea FC manager Jose Mourinho declaring in a press conference, “If I talk, I will be in serious trouble. And I do not wish to get into serious problems.”
Weeks later, in a rematch against Niemann at the Julius Baer Generational Cup, Carlsen abruptly resigned after making only one move online. It was obvious that he would not play Niemann.
Carlsen stayed mute, enabling the chess community to speculate about what was going on. Numerous others assumed Carlsen was indicating Niemann had cheated.
Then, on Monday, Carlsen clarified his position.
Carlsen stated, “I believe Niemann has cheated more frequently and more recently than he has openly admitted.”
Carlsen claimed Niemann, who acknowledged to cheating in two online matches when he was 12 and 16, was far too aloof during their Sinquefield match. Niemann admitted to cheating in two online matches when he was 12 and 16.
“Throughout our Sinquefield Cup match, I had the sensation that he wasn’t nervous or even completely concentrating on the game in important positions, despite outplaying me as black in a style that I believe only a handful of players are capable of,” Carlsen remarked.
Hans Niemann.
YouTube/Saint Louis Chess Club
Niemann has denied ever cheating against Carlsen or in an over-the-board game.
There is currently no evidence that Niemann cheated against Carlsen. Kenneth Regan, a teaching member at the University at Buffalo who specializes in chess and identifying cheats, has stated that he saw nothing in Niemann’s play at the Sinquefield Cup to suggest he cheated.
Carlsen stated in his statement that he need Niemann’s “explicit consent” to continue speaking.
Even Ashley was uncertain as to what Carlsen was referring to, but he stated that Carlsen must provide evidence that Niemann cheated.
Ashley stated, “If you are going to accuse someone of cheating, it is such a horrible charge.” “This is a possibly career-ending claim against Hans, a 19-year-old, and you have the responsibility, in my opinion, to give more evidence than your intuition.”
How does chess cheating work?
2016 Maurice Ashley.
Mark Lennihan/AP Images
According to Ashley, chess cheating is about gathering information: What is the best possible move? Is there a move that a player is oblivious to?
Cheating online is significantly simpler. According to Ashley, there are now computer programs that can frequently make better moves than people.
Online matches have precautions against cheating. In larger competitions, cameras are installed behind the participants to monitor their screens. Anti-cheating software can also monitor what is displayed on a player’s screen.
Officials can also be alerted to probable cheating if players consistently make plays that correspond with what computers recommend. Other anomalies, such as accelerated movement, can also attract attention.
However, there are still restrictions.
Ashley remarked, “You are at your home.” “Like, to what extent can they bug your room so that no information may enter from the outside?”
Ashley stated that officials also rely on the integrity of participants to not cheat.
He stated that the practice is prevalent, at least at lower levels. Chess.com is believed to have some of the greatest anti-cheating software available, yet it still deals with a significant amount of cheating — the website claims it closes more than 500 accounts per day for cheating and has closed approximately 500,000 accounts throughout its history.
The online chess game between Magnus Carlsen and Hans Niemann.
accessed through Julius Baer Generation Cup/Chess Videos
Cheating during over-the-board contests is far more difficult to prove.
Methods, such as a player getting communication from a disguised electrical gadget, have been rumored. In 2013, the Bulgarian footballer Borislav Ivanov was suspected of concealing a device in his shoe after refusing to remove them for a search. Despite the fact that no device was ever discovered, Ivanov retired shortly thereafter.
Players are no longer permitted to bring cell phones to events, and certain tournaments require players to pass through metal detectors.
Niemann, for instance, offered to play a match naked to demonstrate he was not concealing communication gear.
According to Ashley, in events where spectators are permitted, players may also acquire visual clues from “accomplices.” Even though the grandmaster stated that doing so would be “brave” due to the number of authorities present, experienced players could be tipped off by a simple gesture.
“A chess player needs few things. “I mean, eyeballs looking up at the ceiling could indicate that you have a really, really fantastic move that you should look for immediately,” Ashley added. “Many times, all a grandmaster needs to do is look for anything exceptional… stop looking at routine moves and search for a beautiful sacrifice, an unusual strategy.”
Ashley stated that there had been no instances of cheating at the highest level of chess, where top players have “immaculate” reputations, in recent memory.
As a result of Carlsen’s charge of Niemann, Ashley asserts that it is now possible for other players to be accused.
Ashley stated, “Now it’s as though everyone is under suspicion.” It’s starting to feel as though it might be anyone.
“And while there are those of us who look and say, ‘No, these guys are world-class players; they would never do such a thing,’ from the perspective of the general audience, why not? How do you know?”