Hillary Clinton reignited political tensions on January 8, 2026, when she publicly called the fatal ICE shooting of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis “murder.
The former first lady, senator, and secretary of state praised protesters who rallied against the federal agency after the 37-year-old mother was killed.
Clinton’s message quickly went viral, framing the death as an example of what she described as “lawless violence” by the Trump administration.
She wrote, “Last night, at the corner where an ICE agent murdered Renee Good, thousands of Minnesotans gathered in the frigid dark to protest her killing.
In the face of this administration’s lawless violence, solidarity is the answer.
They want to mold America to their cruelty. We refuse.”
Conservative Critics Slam Clinton’s Statement
Clinton’s remarks were met with immediate backlash from conservatives, who accused her of inflaming tensions.
Megyn Kelly described the statement as “disgusting,” arguing it endangered lives while Clinton enjoyed protection and staff in her home.
Charles Gasparino questioned the legal accuracy of labeling the incident “murder,” pointing out that the term carries a precise legal meaning.
John Daniel Davidson accused the Democratic Party of promoting unrest in Minneapolis, claiming that such statements encourage violence.
Minneapolis Leaders Respond to the Shooting
The reaction in Minneapolis itself was swift and fiery.
Mayor Jacob Frey delivered an expletive-laden speech, demanding ICE leave the city immediately.
He criticized the agency’s framing of the shooting as self-defense, calling it “bull***” after personally reviewing video footage of the incident.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz echoed Frey’s skepticism, promising a thorough, fair, and expeditious investigation to hold those responsible accountable.
National Voices Join the Chorus
Several prominent Democrats also condemned the shooting.
California Governor Gavin Newsom labeled the act “state-sponsored terrorism,” saying the Trump administration had escalated cruelty and extremism while ignoring safeguards and accountability.
He directly linked the president to Good’s death, warning that such aggressive tactics have real consequences for citizens.
Comedian Jimmy Kimmel joined the discussion on national television, calling Trump a “maniac” and highlighting the disconnect between the administration’s statements and the video evidence.
While Kimmel noted that ultimate blame should be determined in court, he criticized the portrayal of Good as the aggressor.
Trump Allies Defend the Administration and ICE
On the other side of the political spectrum, Trump supporters doubled down in support of ICE. JD Vance urged agents to continue their operations despite growing protests, framing the demonstrations as attacks on law enforcement.
President Trump himself claimed that Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer,” asserting that the agent acted in self-defense.
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem reinforced the administration’s narrative, claiming that Good had been “stalking” agents and obstructing federal operations.
She called for legal action against anyone using vehicles to threaten ICE officers, labeling it domestic terrorism.
The Shooting and Immediate Fallout
Renee Nicole Good, 37, was shot three times in the head by ICE agent Jonathan Ross while inside her SUV, triggering protests and civil unrest throughout Minneapolis.
Governor Walz responded by activating the National Guard, citing fear, anger, and disillusionment among residents.
The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension stepped aside, allowing the FBI to take over the investigation to ensure independence and transparency.
Walz emphasized the importance of Minnesota being part of the investigation, criticizing public figures for spreading “verifiably false” claims about the case.
The Department of Homeland Security had already deployed more than 2,000 officers in what it described as its largest-ever immigration enforcement operation, highlighting the scale and intensity of federal activity in the area.
Legal Debate and Political Fallout
The shooting has intensified a national debate over federal law enforcement, immigration policy, and the use of deadly force.
Democrats have labeled it murder, while legal experts note that criminal liability hinges on technical interpretations of deadly force statutes rather than public outrage.
As protests continue and investigations unfold, the incident has become a flashpoint in the broader conflict over federal authority, civil liberties, and community safety.
Looking Ahead
With the FBI leading the investigation, Minneapolis remains tense.
The political fallout continues to spread across the country, with high-profile figures on both sides using the incident to advance their narratives.
How authorities reconcile public anger with legal standards and accountability will likely shape the conversation about ICE, federal enforcement, and citizen safety for months to come.
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn