The European Union is considering a major revision of post-World War II policies regarding asylum seekers, aiming to address current geopolitical realities.
The 1951 Refugee Convention, which established guidelines for refugee protection, is seen by many as outdated.
A diplomatic paper obtained by The Times states that the convention, created in a very different geopolitical context, no longer fits the needs of today’s Europe.
Originally signed by 144 countries, the convention includes a critical principle: no asylum seeker should be returned to a country where their life or freedom is in danger.
However, this principle is being questioned.
Over the past decade, millions of asylum seekers have requested refugee status in Europe, and many countries have faced difficulties in handling these requests, especially when it comes to deporting those whose applications are rejected.
Some critics argue that the current rules don’t reflect the challenges European governments face in controlling immigration and ensuring national security.
Struggles with Integration and National Security
The EU’s internal discussions, particularly those led by Poland, highlight the issues that asylum policies pose for European nations.
While the principle of non-refoulement is essential, the paper argues that it has become an obstacle for effective asylum management.
The EU is now considering proposals to speed up the deportation process for failed asylum seekers and those involved in criminal activities.
Some European leaders also point out that certain migrant communities do not integrate well into society, leading to social divisions and undermining European values.
There have been concerns raised about violent crimes being linked to refugees and migrants with permanent residency in Europe, particularly in countries like Germany.
The current system, which protects such individuals from deportation, has led to increased frustrations.
Proposals for migrant centers outside the EU for asylum seekers waiting on decisions face significant legal challenges, as many argue that they would violate the Refugee Convention.
The Politics of Migration Across Europe
The 2015 Syrian refugee crisis significantly contributed to a surge in illegal migration into Europe, and the flow of asylum requests has remained high ever since.
This issue has become a key point of contention, particularly among nationalist and populist political groups across the continent.
In Germany, migration is set to be a central issue in the upcoming elections, with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party gaining momentum.
Conservative leader Friedrich Merz, who is predicted to win over Social Democrat Chancellor Olaf Scholz, has been vocal about implementing tougher measures against asylum seekers.
Merkel’s 2015 decision to open Germany’s borders to over one million migrants has been heavily criticized by right-wing groups for fueling the migration crisis.
Former Chancellor Merkel recently expressed her disagreement with a CDU motion passed in parliament with support from the AfD, which challenged long-standing political norms in the country.
Sweden’s Tougher Stance on Citizenship
Meanwhile, Sweden is tightening its immigration policies, particularly when it comes to granting citizenship.
The government recently unveiled proposals for stricter requirements for those seeking Swedish nationality.
A recent investigation suggested that prospective citizens should demonstrate an “honest living” and that the time required to live in Sweden before being eligible for citizenship should increase from five to eight years.
Applicants would also need to pass a test on Swedish society, values, and language proficiency.
Migration Minister Johan Forssell emphasized that citizenship should be earned, not automatically granted, and that it plays a crucial role in unifying people of diverse backgrounds under a common national identity.
Forssell underscored Sweden’s core values, such as gender equality, personal freedoms, and the right to participate in activities like swimming or playing football.
He made it clear that if individuals do not accept these values, Sweden may not be the right place for them.
What Lies Ahead?
The push for stricter asylum policies and tougher immigration laws signals a shift in Europe’s approach to migration.
With the EU debating potential changes to the Refugee Convention and individual countries like Germany and Sweden pushing forward with new laws, the future of asylum and migration in Europe is at a crossroads.
As tensions rise, the question remains: how will these new policies reshape Europe’s demographic landscape and the lives of those seeking refuge?