In a controversial decision, a Slovakian man who was previously jailed for a violent attack on a woman with a shovel has been permitted to remain in Britain.
This comes after claims that he had been successfully ‘rehabilitated.’
The 22-year-old had spent 15 months behind bars after participating in a mass brawl involving other Slovakians at a community centre in Stoke-on-Trent.
Violent Brawl and Serious Disorder
The brawl occurred in a car park following an event at the centre, where two groups of partygoers clashed using weapons such as shovels, metal bars, and bats.
The violent altercation left several people injured.
It was during this fight that the man struck a woman with a shovel, knocking her to the ground.
The incident was described by a judge as a “large-scale episode of serious public disorder.”
Deportation Attempt Blocked by Immigration Judge
The Home Office attempted to deport the man, citing his criminal history, which includes three prior convictions for threats, abuse, and driving while disqualified.
They argued that he posed a “serious threat to the public.”
However, the deportation was blocked by Upper Immigration Tribunal Judge Christopher John Hanson.
He noted that the man’s “rehabilitation appears to have been very successful” based on the fact that he had not reoffended since his release.
The judge also pointed out that it would be more challenging to deport him due to the incident occurring before Brexit, which has impacted certain legal protections for EU nationals.
A History of Violence and Alcohol Issues
The Slovakian man, whose identity remains anonymous, is known to have a short temper and is reportedly prone to violence when drinking.
During the brawl, he allegedly supplied weapons, including a metal bar, from his van.
His brothers are also facing deportation related to the same incident.
Despite this violent background, a probation report showed that he had completed anger management, violence, and alcohol-related courses, and had stayed out of trouble for two years post-release.
Public Outcry and Criticism
The decision has sparked strong criticism from several quarters.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Phelps condemned the ruling, stating that “Violent foreign criminals should be kicked out” and that protecting the British public should take priority over the rights of criminals.
In response, a Home Office spokesman emphasized their commitment to removing foreign criminals from the UK, assuring the public that they will take every step to ensure criminals are not allowed to remain in the country.
The case highlights the complex balance between immigration law, criminal justice, and the safety of the public, with many calling for stronger measures to deport those who commit violent crimes.